<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Names and titles</title>
	<link>http://grandhistorian.com/wordpressmu/names</link>
	<description>Who's that Gong ?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on testing by fcharton</title>
		<link>http://grandhistorian.com/wordpressmu/names/2008/03/27/testing/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>fcharton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://grandhistorian.com/wordpressmu/names/2008/03/27/testing/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>and I would shoot you down with a comment like this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and I would shoot you down with a comment like this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nobility titles in the Chunqiu - the elusive 公 by fcharton</title>
		<link>http://grandhistorian.com/wordpressmu/names/2008/03/24/hello-world/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>fcharton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://grandhistorian.com/wordpressmu/names/2008/03/24/hello-world/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>it is not gone, I stupidly left the moderation on... which meant I must read it before you could see it... this is disabled now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is not gone, I stupidly left the moderation on&#8230; which meant I must read it before you could see it&#8230; this is disabled now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nobility titles in the Chunqiu - the elusive 公 by baopu</title>
		<link>http://grandhistorian.com/wordpressmu/names/2008/03/24/hello-world/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>baopu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://grandhistorian.com/wordpressmu/names/2008/03/24/hello-world/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I left a comment. Now its gone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I left a comment. Now its gone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nobility titles in the Chunqiu - the elusive 公 by Bao Pu</title>
		<link>http://grandhistorian.com/wordpressmu/names/2008/03/24/hello-world/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Bao Pu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://grandhistorian.com/wordpressmu/names/2008/03/24/hello-world/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Hi Francois,

Just to add some more information, Lothar Falkenhausen, in his article "The Concept of Wen in the Ancient Chinese Ancestral Cult" in &lt;i&gt;Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews&lt;/i&gt; (CLEAR), Vol. 18. (Dec., 1996) says of Gong:

"The meaning of gong in ancestral ritual is quite multifarious-in early contexts, it may mean "lineage head" or simply "ancestor."

Also, "The common translation of gong as "Duke" reflects the systematized set of aristocratic ranks recorded in late pre-Qin texts; inscriptions from earlier parts of the Zhou dynasty, however, fail to reveal
any indication that such a system existed in those times (see Si 1947, Wang 1983, and Sheng 1983). Gong is still used in funerary inscriptions in modem times meaning, generally, "ancestor."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Francois,</p>
<p>Just to add some more information, Lothar Falkenhausen, in his article &#8220;The Concept of Wen in the Ancient Chinese Ancestral Cult&#8221; in <i>Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews</i> (CLEAR), Vol. 18. (Dec., 1996) says of Gong:</p>
<p>&#8220;The meaning of gong in ancestral ritual is quite multifarious-in early contexts, it may mean &#8220;lineage head&#8221; or simply &#8220;ancestor.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, &#8220;The common translation of gong as &#8220;Duke&#8221; reflects the systematized set of aristocratic ranks recorded in late pre-Qin texts; inscriptions from earlier parts of the Zhou dynasty, however, fail to reveal<br />
any indication that such a system existed in those times (see Si 1947, Wang 1983, and Sheng 1983). Gong is still used in funerary inscriptions in modem times meaning, generally, &#8220;ancestor.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
